Many people confuse seeding and
ranking. While "ranking" is a quantitative system that rewards individuals
for their level of participation and/or placement in events, "seeding" is a
qualitative method used to make the draw as fair as possible for all
competitors. In seeding an event, the tournament director must consider as much
information as possible on each competitor ... including -- but not limited to
-- earned ranking positions.
Five Factors -- The USRA uses five major criteria
to determine seeds for national events. They are:
1. the previous year's results
2. regional results (if available)
3. results from other national events in the preceding 12 months
4. rankings from other associations (IRT, LPRA, Seniors, etc)
5. national rankings
1. Previous Year's Results -- The current National Champion
is always given the opportunity to defend their title ... they have earned the
#1 seed position. The #2 seed is normally given to the previous year's second
place finisher. Again it is felt that they have earned the position. With
respect to #3 and #4 seeds, the previous year's semi-finalists may retain those
positions, but it is not guaranteed. Other factors taken into consideration are
regional results and new players moving into the division for the first time
(someone who previously won 35+ but now moves into 40+.) Remaining seeds are
determined by evaluation of all five criteria listed.
2. Regional Results -- Since all players must compete in
regionals (for National Singles) this is a somewhat reliable indicator of a
person's strength in their region. Of course, all regionals are not equal, and
complete regional drawsheets are evaluated before final seedings are
determined. Regional winners are normally placed within the remaining top 16
seeded positions.
3. Results from Other National Events -- Both the U.S. Open
and National Singles events are evaluated before seedings are determined. In
the "more mature" brackets, results from Senior and Masters tournaments are
used to assist with seeding
4. Rankings from other Associations -- Rankings from other
associations, such as LPRA and IRT, are evaluated, as well as Masters and
Seniors records.
5. National Rankings -- National rankings are used to make
sure someone who has established a national ranking (especially A, B, C)
receives a fair placement in the draw. Since national rankings are based
primarily on local events, these rankings are the last criteria evaluated.
After an initial division draw has been established, it is sent to
second and third parties for evaluation and comments (normally people involved
closely with the events: athlete representative for Open divisions, Masters
Council representative for Masters draw, etc.) After all parties agree, the
draw is finalized. |